Sanal.org
till 01th May 2006
Categories
.NET (40)
Art (1)
Blogs (1)
Computers (6)
Information (13)
Internet (11)
Movies (5)
Music (19)
MY SQL (5)
People (16)
Russian (20)
Security (15)
SEO (3)
SQL SERVER (8)
Technology (6)
Turkey (2)
Video (7)
More
TOP 50
Turkish News


Archive
April (2008)
March (2008)
February (2008)
January (2008)
December (2007)
Novamber (2007)
October (2007)
September (2007)
August (2007)
July (2007)
June (2007)
May (2007)
April (2007)
March (2007)
February (2007)
January (2007)
December (2006)
Novamber (2006)
October (2006)
September (2006)
August (2006)
July (2006)
June (2006)
May (2006)
April (2006)
March (2006)
February (2006)
January (2006)
December (2005)
October (2005)
April (2005)
December (1969)

22

ROR
Previous1234Next



Stumblinig Around in the Dark

Although I’m sick to death of the concept of hierarchies, I happened to stumble upon Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs this morning. I haven’t thought about it since a brush with it in Psych 101 in college. I think there’s something to be said here about this model in that it shows (me, at least) where adoptees tend to have a more difficult time reaching the highest level of transcendence, the highest potential of human existence. I write about this today because it provides as good an explanation as any about why I feel that I carry around a huge, invisible black hole in the center of my being.

Abraham Maslow (1954) created his pyramid model of hierarchy of human needs based on two groupings: deficiency needs and growth needs. Within the deficiency needs, each lower need must be met before moving up to the next higher level. Once each of these needs has been satisfied, if at some future time a deficiency is detected, the individual will act to remove the deficiency. The first four levels, the deficiency needs from lowest to highest, are:

1) Physiological needs: hunger, thirst, bodily comforts, etc.
2) Safety/security needs: out of danger
3) Belonginess and Love needs: affiliate with others, be accepted
4) Esteem needs: to achieve, be competent, gain approval and recognition

According to Maslow, an individual is ready to act upon the growth needs if and only if the deficiency needs are met.

The other four levels, the growth needs from lowest to highest, are:

5) Need to know and understand
6) Aesthetic needs: symmetry, order, beauty
7) Self-actualization: find self-fulfillment and realize one’s potential
8) Transcendence: to connect to something beyond the ego or to help others find self-fulfillment and realize their potential

I guess what I’m getting at here is that adoption as it stands, that is, the status quo forever freezes adoptees in the growth need bottom of the hierarchy. I don’t mean that adoptees never reach the higher levels; I just mean that if they do it’s nothing short of a miracle. I mean that in general, although our physical needs may be met (sometimes in spades) we are not allowed to know our origins; we are not allowed to question or understand; we are told we belong while knowing in our guts that we do not; we carry around the lifelong stigma of rejection and are therefore always on alert (lifelong Post Traumatic Stress Disorder); we feel forever inferior because of that rejection, because we are different and don’t really belong anywhere, either with our first families or with our adoptive families.

As I ponder Maslow’s hierarchy I can begin to see why I (and I’m only speaking about me) have never felt that I own myself enough to be “self-actualized” in his sense, and most crushing of all, I see how this inability relates to my lifelong frustration about always being too self-protective to step out of myself, to “transcend” enough to help others find self-fulfillment on some level. I would think that when “deficiency” needs aren’t met, humans will find it difficult, if not impossible, to realize “growth” needs. We’re too busy strugging to make sense of our world to reach our full potential. I hasten to add that there are probably oodles of adoptees who have reached self-fulfillment and changed the world for the better. Maybe they had better luck or determination than the rest of us. Whatever it was, my guess (and I don’t know why I think this) is that their luck or determination was mostly inner-directed.

I can only speak for myself, but this model really underscores my life-long sense of walking around in the dark carrying an unlit candle. I need to know that I exist. And because I don’t really know that, I spend most of my time in fetal position, inside my own head looking for some meaning that isn’t there. I see this as a deep deprivation, a tear in the fabric of human identity, brought about by the structure of Western civilization.

Those who aren’t adopted can’t possibly understand an adoptee’s state of existence; they can only imagine it and/or throw “answers” and advice at me; tell me how lucky I was to have a family who took care of my physical needs; tell me I can heal. This isn’t a “poor me” post, even though it looks like one. It’s a “me-sorting out-why-things-feel-the-way-they-do” post.

[Oh, and does anyone know where Peter (Acts of Resistence) is? Why his blog has gone missing? ]




They're Still at It

The bitch that bore Hitler is still in heat–Bertholt Brecht

After reading the comments on my previous post, I had to follow Heatherrainbow’s link (thanks Heatherrainbow) to the New York Times (the one about the “perfect” Aryan children adopted by Nazis) and found the page had been removed. So I found it on BBC NEWS for Nov. 4. It does bear an eery resemblance to the “egg donor program” advertisements that bombard print media nationwide these days. For anyone who missed it, here it is:

Nazi ‘master race’ children meet


A group of children selected by Adolf Hitler’s Nazi regime with the aim of creating an Aryan master race has met openly for the first time as adults.

Children from the Nazis’ “Lebensborn” or “Font of Life” project gathered in the German town of Wernigerode to discuss the trauma over their origins.

The project aimed to create a breed of people that fitted the Nazis’ physical ideal and could manage a future empire.

It saw thousands of often illegitimate children placed in Nazi members’ homes.

The children were frequently selected for qualities the Nazis regarded as typically Aryan, such as blonde hair, blue eyes or pale skin.

They were often adopted by the families of the Nazis’ elite force, the SS. For years those children either did not know about their past or were too ashamed to discuss it in public.

Trauma and prejudice

The head of a group of people who grew up under the project said Saturday’s gathering was a means of exposing myths about the system.

“The aim was to take the children out into the open, to encourage those affected to find out their origins,” Matthias Meissner of the Lebensspuren, or “Traces of Life” group said.

He said the meeting was also a way of showing “the outside world that the cliche of the stud farm with blond-haired, blue-eyed parents is not correct”.

Many children from the project grew up to face prejudice and personal problems over their origins.

Folker Heinicke, 66, was taken from his parents in Ukraine and brought up by a German family.

He told the Associated Press news agency: “There was always a feeling inside that something was not quite right.”

“I was ripped away from my mother.”

While thousands of children with apparently desirable Aryan qualities were nurtured by the Nazis, the regime’s aim to create a perfect race also underpinned the genocide of millions of Jews and other minorities.




Where is America's Politkovskaya? Part 2.

This is my answer to Mark Ames question.

Any war dehumanizes people. No matter what were the reasons for war the moment people start killing each other humaneness is lost and sooner or later only the need to survive remains. But fighting nations need soldiers who beyond survival can also behave “heroically”. How can you force a sane person into killing more enthusiastically? He must hate the enemy. He must hate not an abstract enemy but any concrete enemy soldier who looks exactly like you and me. One needs some magic to transform an ordinary person into beast, insect, disgusting piece of dirt, sadist and not actually a human being at all. This task at war is performed by war journalists.

War journalists should satisfy a number of hard demands, like
- The should be brave and courageous. This is a real war after all.
- They should be sincere and truly believe in what they write even when they fantasize.
- They should be able to find some real facts about enemy’s crimes to sound credible.
- They should be able to write beautiful fiction and to add chilling details to the facts they find. Who at war is really interested that two children were killed by a hellicopter missle? A real war correspondent should decribe in great details how the pilot was intentionally hunting the poor kids, how tears of the helpless babies were streaming down their faces, how the pilot was laughing demonically when pushing the button and how horrible their mutilated bodies looked. Some call it death porn but for a war correspondent it’s job – nobody says wars are pretty.
- In case there are no facts at hand war correspondents should always be able to find credible witnesses and make interviews with them.

That's exactly what Anna Politkovskaya was – a war journalist fighting on the side of Chechen rebels. And she did her job fine. I believe her books and articles helped dozens of Chechen men and women to become guirillas and suicide bombers. During proper wars like WW2 nations don’t have war correspondents writing “truth” about their soldiers but in case an army is fighting guerillas like in Chechnya or Iraq things are different. First, such wars are mostly distant and don’t disturb everyday activities of ordinary citizens. Second, we live in a very politically correct world where big transnational NGO’s keep a close eye on human rights and power abuses. This way it’s normal that there’re many Politkovskayas both in Russia and in America. Only people both in Russia or America have very little interest to read books where their sons are described as sadistic orcs from Mordor. Enemy war correspondents are almost always marginal figures to the general public in there native countries but are extremely popular in countries that support their enemies. This is why Politkovskaya was so popular in the West and Gore Vidal is so loved in Iran.

Things would be very different if the war with Iraq would’ve been real. Imagine – Iraqi tanks at the gates of Chicago, half of the country lies in ruins, office workers of yesterday are toiling at production lines. What kind of reaction newspaper stories about American soldiers raping helpless Iraqis would provoke?

Taken, for example, into the context of WW2 Politkovskaya’s best stories would sound outrageous. Imagine a Christmas 1944 Time issue with an article by Ann Politkoff. Young American intelligence officers arrest two poor German farmers Hans and Fritz, put them into a pit with water where they lie naked in their own excements when the temperature is at ice point. From time to time American officers rape them saying, “We do so because your German women don’t want to sleep with us”. At last Hans and Fritz are set free. They find Ann and tell her the story but she has to keep them anonymous as well as the place where they were tortured – evil Americans would certainly hunt them down and kill. “Now the only thing I want is revenge, - says Fritz – That’s why everyone in American uniform is a legitimate target for me.”

The story sounds absolutely absurd. How long can a person survive in a pit with freezing water? Did young intelligence offices washed the poor guys from excrements before raping them? How comes they don’t rape German women who don’t want to sleep with them? Why at last didn’t they kill them? On the other hand if this story would've been published in Voelkischer Beobachter Germans in 1944 would’ve found it totally credible – everybody knows Americans are irrational sadists and perverts.


Previous1234Next

0.015625


Mysql & .NET & Everything | Kitap | Forum | Haberler | Havacilik | Daily News | Noticias